Monday, January 26, 2015

CFP: Illustration, Comics, and Animation Conference (March 1; May 8-10)

General Call for Papers
Illustration, Comics,
and Animation Conference
Dartmouth College
May 8-10

What is the future of illustration studies? 
What can comics scholars learn from animation studies and vice versa?\ 
Do illustrated books or graphic novels resist the supposed obsolescence of the book? What do pictures want (now)?
These and related questions will be explored at the Illustration, Comics, and Animation Conference at Dartmouth College to be held May 8-10, 2015.

Scholars interested in the illustrated image in all of its mediated guises are invited to participate in this interdisciplinary conference. Nearly all illustrated or drawn ‘texts’ are eligible for consideration:
  • comics and graphic novels
  • cartoons and animated films
  • picture books
  • illustrated books
And given the uniquely plenary nature of the conference, which brings together scholarship on static and moving illustrations, preference will be given to proposals that seek to bridge visual media. Possible topics may include:
  • Individual titles by prominent practitioners in the field
  • Identity, subjectivity, authority, ideology or culture in or more type of illustration media
  • The future of particular schools of criticism (psychoanalysis, critical race theory, phenomenology, Marxism, feminism, queer theory, post-colonialism, formalism, aesthetic theories, etc.) and one or more type of illustration media
  • The contributions of archives and libraries to the study of comics, animation, and illustration.
The location of the conference may also be a source of inspiration for prospective participants. Not only does Dartmouth College lie in close proximity to the Center for Cartoon Studies in White River Junction, Vermont, it is also the origin of Theodor Geisel, Dr. Seuss, a Dartmouth graduate of the Class of 1925.

Individual papers should be no longer than 20 minutes. Panels shall be ninety minutes long and should be comprised of three presenters and one chair. Please send 300 word abstracts and a brief bio for each proposed paper no later than March 1, 2015.

Send all proposals and inquiries to:
Michael A. Chaney <michael.chaney@dartmouth.edu>

Labels: , , , , ,


Friday, September 19, 2014

CFP: Marvel Feature Films / essay collection (Nov. 15)

Call for Papers
Marvel Feature Films
edited by Robert Moses Peaslee,
Matt McEniry, and Robert G. Weiner

The recent release of Guardians of the Galaxy marks the penultimate film in the so-called second “phase” of the Marvel Cinematic Universe, a group of big-budget tentpole films that include Marvel’s The Avengers, Captain America: The Winter Solider, Thor: Dark World, Iron Man 1-3, and the Incredible Hulk. Meanwhile, other studios like Sony and Fox have had success with films based on Marvel properties such as the X-Men and Spider-Man.

Feature films and full-length television movies based on Marvel characters go back to the 1970s, however, and very little scholarship has been produced on these films. The editors of this volume seek essays that discuss Marvel feature length films, and while we will consider essays that deal with the Marvel Cinematic Universe and more recent films, we are particularly interested in those films that have not received a lot of scholarly attention (including television and animated features).  We are also interested in work dealing with films produced when certain characters were Marvel properties (like Transformers, G. I. Joe, and Conan). Please note we are not interested in television series, per se, but rather the full-length films produced from them. We are also interested in the business aspect of Marvel Films and Marvel Animation.  We will also consider essays on those unauthorized foreign films based on Marvel characters like Turkish Captain America/Spider-Man, etc.

We are particularly interested in considering essays dealing with:
Transformers (1986), G.I. Joe (1987), Howard the Duck (1986), Captain America  (1979, 1990), Inhumanoids: the Movie (1986),  Trial of the Incredible Hulk (1989), Man-Thing (2005), Ghost Rider (2007, 2011), Spider-Man: The Dragon’s Challenge (1979), Dr. Strange (1979), Generation X (1996), Power Pack (1991), Punisher (1989), Nick Fury: Agent of Shield (1998), Blade 1-3 (1998, 2002, 2004), Elektra (2005), Thor: Tales of Asgard (2011), Iron Man: Rise of Technovore (2013), Planet Hulk (2010), Fantastic Four (1994) and Next Avengers (2008).

A brief but by no means conclusive list of interesting questions to consider:

  • How has Disney’s acquisition of Marvel changed the blockbuster landscape?
  • Why were certain television or direct to video films like Captain America (1990), Captain America: Death Too Soon or Spider-Man: The Dragon’s Challenge released theatrically overseas?
  • Why did Howard the Duck fail to live up to its hype, and what are we to make of his recent reappearance in the CMU?
  • How can we think more deeply about the use of legend and myth in these films?
  • What was the production history of Transformers (1986) and how did the film eventually factor into the continuity of the Marvel comics series? 
  • Cyberpunk influences, particularly in films like Iron Man: Rise of Technovore
  • Faustian influences in the Ghost Rider films and the use of the original Ghost Rider, Carter Slade, in the first film.
  • How Daredevil and Thor were used in the Hulk television films?
  • While Blade was moderately successfully in 1998, why did it take the 2000’s X-Men to kick start the current wave of Marvel and superhero films?
  • Generation X as an example of X-film?
  • Has Marvel Animation been successful compared to DC in producing high quality animated films?
  • Planet Hulk as Greek/Roman myth?
  • Traditional vampire lore in the Blade series.
  • Spider-Man as a villain in the Turkish 3 Dev Adam, also featuring Captain America.
  • The Bollywood 'Tu Mera Superman featuring a mash-up of Superman and Spider-Woman?
  • Production history of producer Roger Corman’s ill-fated attempt at the $2 million Fantastic Four film.

Please submit a 200-500 word abstract by November 15th to Rob.weiner@ttu.edu and Matthew.mceniry@ttu.edu

Upon acceptance final essays will be due on Feb 15th.

Labels: , , , , , , ,


Tuesday, October 08, 2013

An Ape of One's Own (for Phil Nutman)

This is for you, Phil.

Right now, I should be preparing my presentation on opportunities for female cartoonists in children's literature, which I was invited to give at the University of Connecticut next week. But before I can do that, I want - I need - to post an old review-essay of mine, from July 2006. It has nothing to do with comics, although it does talk a bit about animation. But if it weren't for the essay below, I'm not certain that I would be speaking at UConn next week.

Several years ago, I was going through a very rough period, and one of the side effects was that I was no longer writing. Oh, I was trying to write; but nothing would ever gel, not my words, not my thoughts. I received plenty of invitations to write. But my projects were started, sweated over, and abandoned. I had a lot of supportive people in my life, but there were hurdles over which I simply couldn't make it.

Several years before that, I and my then-wife Kate had met Phil Nutman and his then-wife Anya at Necon, and somehow we all hit it off. He was a gregarious British author (Wet Work) and journalist (Fangoria), and he was getting into film; I was a wallflower American academic. But still. Soon every year we were a foursome in the Necon min-golf tournament, and I would spend many late nights with Phil in wide-ranging conversations. He was whip-smart, razor-funny, and hyper-energetic.

In the early summer of 2006, deep into my depression, Phil contacted me about a new online magazine he was starting, Up Against the Wall: The Magazine that Takes No Prisoners. (Phil never did things in half-measures.) He asked me to review something near and dear to both our hearts: The recent 14-disc PLANET OF THE APES ULTIMATE DVD COLLECTION. We had bonded in part over our love of the Apes films, so naturally (for him) he thought of me to write a review for the first issue of his new magazine. I tried to beg off of it; I desperately wanted to write the piece, of course, but I knew that I couldn't do it. I had disappointed too many editors in the past few years, and I wasn't about to do that to Phil, too.

Phil would not let me get away with that.

I don't remember exactly which ploy of Phil's was finally the one to get me to cry "uncle" and swear that I would try, although I do remember more than a couple of emails and phone calls. Undoubtedly there was begging, there was flattery, there were promises about lord knows what now. But Phil made one thing perfectly clear: He believed in me.

This was something that all of Phil's friends knew and could never doubt: Phil believed in them. And here he was, believing in me! Again, other people did, too - I was not alone or abandoned. But Phil's belief was somehow extra-special to me at that time.

He asked for 1500 words. I began typing - hesitantly, at first, but gradually with more gusto. I was used to writing for academia, which demanded a voice which, while not exactly  cold, was nevertheless analytic and impersonal. Even my writing for The Comics Journal, a non-academic publication, had been analytic - I rarely cut loose with my own voice (whatever that was). But Phil wanted me, my passions and not just my brain. He wanted the sense of fun that permeated our conversations to come across through my writing. This was A LOT to ask of me, especially then.

But perhaps that was also the BEST time for him to have asked. He wanted 1500 words; I stopped at nearly three times that number. The writing was hard; it was excruciating; and the result was rough. But it was also fun, by god. It's peppered with jokes (or at least attempts at same) and a bit of foul language. I willed myself to be goofy in print, for once, because Phil expected that.

This review became the only substantial thing I had written in a few years. And Phil loved it, and he wanted to run the whole bloody thing. Anya copy-edited and formatted it with care, and it appeared in the very first issue of Up Against the Wall.

In a fairy tale, this would be the turning point in my life, and I would have started writing again in volume, and better than I ever had before. But as Phil himself knew well, life is no fairy tale. Writing this piece felt great, the sense of accomplishment felt wonderful; but writing was still damned difficult. And it continues to be for me, to this day. I still struggle mightily, but occasionally now there are accomplishments. However, until Phil coaxed the following review out of me, I was pretty well convinced that all of my accomplishments lay behind me. I could never thank him enough for getting me over an ENORMOUS psychological hill.

And now I never will. Phil passed away last night, at the age of 50.

His death was stupid - all deaths are, of course, but his was doubly so, because it should have been preventable. The cliche is to say that Phil was a great guy, but that he was also haunted by demons. And Phil's demons apparently arrived in bottles. That's a side of his that I never really experienced - we hadn't seen each other in a few years, and our correspondence had become spotty and... strange. These often weren't the words of the Phil I recalled so fondly. The Phil I recall is the one who cast me in a 24-hour guerrilla film, who took me shopping before cooking dinner and enthused over fresh vegetables, who got me to unlock my word-hoard when no one and nothing else could. That's the Philip Nutman I mourn tonight.

[UATW folded a couple of years after it began, and the website has long since disappeared. I rescued this essay from Archive.org, cleaning up the dead links. I started to make a few revisions, but then decided to stop. Warts and all for you, Phil.]

An Ape of One’s Own


PLANET OF THE APES: THE ULTIMATE DVD COLLECTION
Review By Gene Kannenberg, Jr.
originally published in Up Against the Wall no. 1, July/August 2006.

I was a child of the Apes.

Growing up in the late 60s / early 70s, I was just the right age to utterly buy into the hype when the PLANET OF THE APES media saturation campaigns were in full swing. I clearly remember my brother and I sitting too close to the TV every Friday night for a month at a time, all the better to absorb Channel 18's twice-yearly (at least) POTA marathons. I was enthralled by the time-travel paradoxes, the evolutionary questions, the philosophical –

Who’m I kidding? I was eight years old. I was in it for the freaking apes, man.
I could not get enough. I've lost count of how many times I saw PLANET; I found BENEATH a bit creepy, especially when the mutants "revealed their inmost selves"; ESCAPE contributed greatly to my (well-deserved) mistrust of authority; CONQUEST could claim both a fightin'-mad Roddy McDowell and another star turn by Ricardo "I love chimpanzees best of all other apes" Montalban; and BATTLE… Well, even when you’re nine years old, you can usually tell shit from Shinola. I caught most of the live-action TV series in its initial run, but I only ever managed to see a few scattered episodes of the Saturday-morning cartoon series thanks to CCD (“Confraternity of Christian Doctrine,” Catholic church’s “Sunday School on Saturday”). And I had my Mego-manufactured Cornelius action figure (doll) – not Galen, dammit; Cornelius – which, in arranged cage matches, would kick the shit out of both my Mego Batman and my Mego Mr. Spock.

So I was pretty excited to learn about PLANET OF THE APES: THE ULTIMATE DVD COLLECTION. For some unfathomable reason I’d skipped buying the earlier DVD box set, although I did manage to acquire – and enjoy the heck out of – the "35th Anniversary Widescreen Edition" double-disc set of the original PLANET. I’d also skipped on getting the TV series collection, partly because I’m cheap, but mostly because I hadn’t remembered a whole lot about it; and what I did remember wasn't all that great. (Except for watching a French-dubbed episode with my wife in Belgium about a decade ago – which was actually pretty cool; finally, the apes were speaking the language of their creator, Pierre Boulle.)

But the ULTIMATE DVD COLLECTION offers just about every APES-related film and TV appearance all in one fell, easy-to-collect swoop. In one small disc folder (the size of five CD jewel cases in a stack) you get all five original films (including the two-disc incarnation of PLANET); the complete live-action POTA television series (including one never-aired episode); and the heretofore-only-available-by-bootleg Saturday morning cartoon series RETURN TO THE PLANET OF THE APES. Oh yeah, you also get the two-disc version of Tim Burton’s stylized but brain-dead (don’t forget "soul-less"!) 2001 "re-imagining."

Best of all, the brick-o'-discs fits snugly into the back of your very own, nearly life-size bust of Caesar! But more on that anon.

Space and sanity preclude me from discussing every movie and every episode in any real detail, but I do want to offer some scattershot observations:

PLANET OF THE APES (1968): The one. The only. Heston of the Apes*. Only Chuck would be cocky enough to smoke a cigar in an oxygen-rich space capsule. Yes, his over-acting at times nearly out-Shatners Shatner – but you can forgive it, because this character’s trapped in a maaaadhouse! And he's alone. Whether you want to or not, you feel for this man; sure, he's a misanthrope, but a misanthrope on a quest for something better than the society he’s willingly left behind. Finding the Statue of Liberty at movie's end only proves to him how right he really was about that society all along – especially poignant after his heartfelt rant to Zaius that "Man was here first – and he was better than you!" And the only thing more effective than Jerry Goldsmith's staccato score in setting the film's disquieting tone is his decision to use no music at all in that final shot. Taylor's world has collapsed, but the ocean pays it no mind…

BENEATH THE PLANET OF THE APES (1970): General Ursus speaks with a religious zeal echoing that of the current [2006] President of the United States ("It is our holy duty to invade!"). But then, so do the mutant underworlders ("The Bomb is a holy weapon of peace" – "Traumatic illusion is a weapon of peace"). To be honest, watching the movie as an adult was more disturbing than when I was a child; those "mutants" were just wearing make-up, but ideas and ideologies aren’t so easily dismissed as you lie awake at night.
Other fun facts:
  • We get to enjoy not one but two future BARNEY MILLER cast members! (Gregory Sierra as “Verger” and James Gregory’s star-turn as "Ursus").
  • Don Pedro Colley must be ever-so-proud that he will be forever remembered by his character's official name as given in the credits: "Negro.”
  • My wife noticed that the hieroglyphic markings on one ape banner look suspiciously like they read "Jeb" (see "religious zeal," above).

ESCAPE FROM THE PLANET OF THE APES (1971): An ingenious way to further the franchise and disguise shrinking budgets: "We'll only use three apes and kill one of them quickly. Think of the money we'll save on make-up!" "But sir, the script calls for Dr. Milo to be killed by a gorilla – doesn't that mean four apes?” "Don't bother me with details – just rent the worst damned gorilla suit you can find!" A pity that the scene where Cornelius learns all the lyrics to "I'm My Own Great-Great-Great-Great-Great-Great-Grandpa" never made it out of the script’s third draft.


The 1973 novel adaptation, by John Jakes
CONQUEST OF THE PLANET OF THE APES (1972): This one does get dark, indeed – apart from Caesar's candy-coated, re-written and re-voiced speech at film's end. While it sort of allows us to see in Caesar a certain predisposition to nonviolence like his parents displayed, it still feels utterly tacked-on after his more-than-justifiable rage. But how, exactly, does one smallish revolt in one city allow all these primitive apes to gain intelligence and overtake the rest of the world? Wouldn't the US Army easily be able to wipe out this pocket of gorilla – guerilla – insurgents? Oh, there's a fifth movie, you say? That'll explain it all, yeah…


BATTLE FOR THE PLANET OF THE APES (1973): Nope.
OK, the film deserves a bit more than that, particularly since now we finally get the extended edition of this film – it's about 10 minutes longer than the theatrical cut. It appears that most of the extra material centers around the bomb sub-plot: The under-dwellers consider using the bomb to solve their ape-infestation problem, but cooler heads ultimately prevail. It's a nice nod to continuity with BENEATH to include this material, even if the film elements are a bit rough (especially the sound in some places). But, speaking of continuity: That Statue of Liberty – it's on the east coast, correct? And that's where BENEATH also takes place? So why is the bomb in California in BATTLE?

But even without the added scenes, there are plenty of pickable nits here. Sure, we see the apes in school, even adult apes, but how in the world did every ape gain the power of speech – not to mention at least semi-rational thought – in just a couple of decades? Particularly when so bloody many of these apes can't be bothered to keep their mouths from hanging open, looking for all the world like humans wearing poorly constructed ape masks? And why does Hollywood always feel the need to kill a child in what’s marketed as a "children’s film"?

Sigh. I had marginal hopes that the extended cut would help redeem this turkey. It’s not the worst genre movie I’ve ever seen (paging VAN HELSING, paging LXG, paging HANGAR 18, paging…), but it's a sad coda to the APES franchise.

PLANET OF THE APES – THE TELEVISION SERIES (1974): Coda, shmoda – there’s a whole lot more Live Ape goodness! Well, "goodness" often proves a relative term, here meaning simply “more.” And more and more… Roddy McDowell said that Galen, his character in the TV series, was his favorite ape role. And I can see why. While his Galen is less angry than Caesar and less coolly competent than Cornelius, he has a lot of personality, loyalty, and naivety, tempered with quick-wittedness – along with a bit of whimsy and sarcasm.

But then, who wouldn't be sarcastic when trapped in a TV series even more derivative of THE FUGITIVE than the Bixby/Ferrigno INCREDIBLE HULK? In every episode Galen and his longtime human companions, astronauts Burke and Virdon (James Naughton and Ron [aka “Uncle Jack”] Harper), would wander into a new village, or farm, or semi-destroyed ancient city, get in a jam with the local authorities and/or gorilla General Urko (Mark "Sarek" Lenard), and eventually make their escape.

The humans in the series have more in common with those in BATTLE than they do with those in the original PLANET. They have speech, they wear clothes, they form societies; but clearly, they must drink from separate water fountains than the Apes do. Television conomics of course played a factor here – more humans mean fewer ape masks – but it also opened new character and story possibilities, always vital for a weekly franchise. Unfortunately, those possibilities never really extended much beyond one-note characters and subtle-as-hurricane lessons about tolerance, acceptance and pacifism. (Not that there’s anything wrong with any of those.)

The ape appliances understandably appeared less pliable and sophisticated than did their film counterparts, but McDowell developed an amazing facility to inject life into Galen’s seemingly botoxed face, as did Lenard (Urko’s overbite helped inject a bit of character, too). Others fared less well, although Roscoe Lee Brown deserves special recognition for an outstanding performance as the governor of an oceanside fishing operation.

The series contains no extra material, apart from a couple of trailers for theatrical versions. I’d expect there has to be some more TV-related material out there; it couldn't all be included in the BEHIND THE PLANET OF THE APES documentary and supplementary materials, could it? It gives the series an incomplete feel on the DVDs; but then, the series was pretty incomplete itself, with no attempt in the last episode either to bring it to a conclusion or at least to open the door to further possibilities. Such narrative expansion would have to wait a year, until…

RETURN TO THE PLANET OF THE APES (1975): This animated series could have been great, if only 97 percent had been done differently. The flatter-than-flat voice acting appalls, the scripts meander and circle back on themselves (no mean feat, considering how little dialog they actually contain), and the animation brings new clarity to the term "limited."

But in its way, it makes for more compelling watching than the live-action series. It re-envisions characters, settings and themes from the first two films, including Cornelius and Zira; mute humans (or, as they’re referred to by everyone, ape or astronaut, “humanoid creatures”); Nova (but wearing whose dogtags?); the underworld populated by mutants; and even political intrigue between the orangutans and the gorillas, epitomized here by Dr. Zaius and General Urko. This time three astronauts land and survive: white man Bill Hudson, black man Jeff Carter (voiced by Austin Stoker, who played MacDonald in BATTLE) and white woman Judy Franklin. But in this version, the apes use technology, more in keeping with Boulle’s original novel: the screen is peppered with images of tanks, jeeps, radios, televisions and more. The apes live in large, modern cities with classical architecture, although it's unclear if they built or "inherited" these cities.
The scripts are indeed weak (he writes charitably), but nevertheless it's intriguing to watch the series' deep-structure develop as the episodes progress. Yes, unlike the live-action series, the cartoon's plot progresses as the episodes unfold. A few episodes are self-contained, but the rest need to be watched in order. Relationships change, alliances are forged, and characters leave, rejoin, or are discovered and become permanent additions to the cast. I don't recall "arcs" in cartoons from back then; hell, they weren’t even that common in live-action.

Yet let's be clear: we’re talking about a show aimed at kids – or maybe even below them – so don’t go looking for too much coherence. For example, in episode three, the under-dwelling mutants kidnap Judy, believing she is their prophesied savior, "Usa." Our male heroes attempt a rescue, but at episode’s end, Judy decides, somewhat illogically, to stay with the mutants. (Perhaps she’s afraid of the destructive beams they can shoot out of their eyes.) Bill and Jeff reluctantly agree, but it’s clear that they believe she’s making a mistake. We’re sure they’ll be back to rescue her, proper-like, in no time. But then for the next few episodes, they never even mention her! After what seems like forever, we do get to see her again, and following a battle between the mutants and the gorilla army, Judy rejoins the humans, who by now have been moved to a mountain-side location safer than their original forest life. Judy's piloting skills eventually come in handy, when the humans commandeer the only working airplane on the planet – a useful tool in many of their following skirmishes with the apes.

An even clearer indication that this is a "kiddie show" is the eventual appearance of both a flying dinosaur (from where?) and a giant, Kong-sized ape, protector of an isolated ape society high in the snowy mountains. Both are patently ridiculous, of course. But even these creatures make a subsequent reappearance in the final episode, in which Cornelius and Zira make a momentous decision: They will show Dr. Zaius and the council a book they had previously discovered, proof of an earlier human civilization. Until that point they had been too afraid of retribution; this decision marks what should be another significant turning point in the narrative. So naturally, the series then wasn’t picked up for another season.

As for the limited animation: Wow, "limited" doesn’t begin to cover it sometimes. A DePatie-Freleng production, it must have had a budget almost in the negative digits. But, to his credit, associate producer Doug Wildey often uses color and composition as fairly effective substitutes for motion. The results can be striking at times, beginning in the first episode, when all the Forbidden Zone hoo-haa (lightning, earthquakes, fire) pops up. Close-ups of the three astronauts’ faces are frozen in confusion and alarm, which could be downright comical. But Wildey uses stark, unrealistic color choices and the irregular addition of high-contrast shadows to reinforce the danger. It might be the most impressionistic Saturday-morning-kiddie-cartoon effect I've ever seen.

Of course, lest we forget, that episode also features a nearly endless sequence of the astronauts simply walking after the crash (echoing the scene from Planet). I swear, it goes on for three or four minutes, and not one word is spoken. There's no way a kid today would tolerate so much dead air – and I bet more than a few back then didn’t, either.

Then again, that silence does spare us from what surely must be some of the worst line-readings ever.  The directors must, for some ungodly reason, have determined that emotions of any kind were to be avoided at all costs.

Finally, a few random items. Giggle at the ape TV newscasters – with mustaches! Guffaw as you hear the apes actually refer to their home as "the planet of the apes"! And hey, doesn't General Urko sound a helluvalot like Fred Flintstone? Why, yes he does!


Michael + Bubbles?
PLANET OF THE APES (2001): I tried. I really tried. But I can't bring myself to care about this film or anyone in it – except, perhaps, for poor, put-upon Pericles. The movie looks pretty enough, and the actors playing simians generally do a good job of, er, aping realistic behaviors, but to what end? The original films, in their own crude way, used the apes as metaphoric tools for constructing arguments about race and class (even while reinforcing stereotypes: the dark-skinned gorillas were warlike and aggressive, the lighter-skinned chimps and orangutans were more civilized and cultured; of course, gorillas are generally peaceful plant-eaters, while chimps are pretty damned vicious). But this film seems to have nothing more to say than "Look at all the money we spent on rilly kewl make-up and effects and shit!"

At least the second disc documents the making of this monstrosity in painstaking detail. This I could get interested in, if only in a detached, "Wow, they really put a lot of work into this" way. Rick Baker and his crew worked their monkey asses off, and the results mostly looked great. (But Helena Bonham Carter’s Ari still looks too much like the later, paler Michael Jackson.) The dozens of special features here make a nice bookend with BEHIND THE PLANET OF THE APES, at least for process geeks like me. Even when I was a kid, what I enjoyed as much as the movies themselves were the short promo pieces that were shown as well. I was fascinated by the ape make-ups: the look of the final actors, to be sure, but also all of the delicate work that went into making all those appliances.

More than once, after being inspired by these mini-documentaries, I’d make detailed ape masks for my brother (he got to be an orangutan) and for myself (a chimpanzee, of course). Not having access to foam rubber or plastics of any kind, I had to make do with paper: One flat piece for the nose and the area around the eyes; an upper and a lower muzzle, each "carefully" constructed from cut, folded and taped paper; and, when I was particularly inspired, a piece of paper crayoned black to fit inside the back of the muzzle to hide our real mouths. For the manes of hair I compromised: we just wore knit winter caps which covered the whole head and left only a hole for the face. I'd then (again "carefully") apply these appliances to our faces using Scotch tape. We’d the run around the house like the monkeys we were until the tape eventually gave way, our paper muzzles swinging pitifully from our lame-o human-child faces.

But my Caesar – my beautiful, beautiful Caesar: never will his muzzle droop. The pièce de résistance of the set is, of course, the absolutely insane bust of Caesar which houses the DVDs. Whoever thought of this concept deserves a goddamn medal. "Let’s see. We’ve crammed 30+ hours of Ape-mania into an incredibly small package; how do we draw attention to it? –I’ve got it! An unwieldy, oversized ape head!" "A hairy ape head, sir?" "You betcher sweet ass, son! The hairier the better! More hair than any ape ever had in one of the movies! Bwa-ha-ha-ha…"

Yes, Caesar's got himself a serious case of helmet-head, but it only serves to draw evermore attention to this objet d’art. Unless you keep it locked away like a crazy relative, your houseguests will never fail to find Caesar, to fawn over him, to want to make him their own. Is it his subtly pre-lapsarian smile? Is it his piercing brown eyes, eyes which – like only the highest-quality representations of Christ – seem to follow you wherever you move? Is it the fact that you can operate the zippers on his green canvas uniform?

For whatever reason, this bust of Caesar – or, as my editor prefers, this fucking ape head – trumps any complaints an ape-o-phile might levy against THE ULTIMATE DVD COLLECTION. "Where are the essays about the films?" you might sneer. "Why does the too-thin booklet waste space by listing only credits, when imdb does it so much more efficiently and completely? Where are the film-specific extra features for any film not titled PLANET OF THE APES? Where's the 'bonus' CD-Rom disc that shipped with Burton's film? Where, oh where are the brushes, combs and pomades mighty Caesar’s luxurious mane surely will require for his inevitable hot date with Just Play Barbie Deluxe Styling Head?"

As if in answer, Caesar beckons, his barely off-center, slightly tilted gaze as reassuring as the sunrise over any non-Forbidden Zone landscape. "Yes, mighty Caesar," you reply. "You are my leader. Wherever you take me, I shall follow. And when I reach the end, the horrible, horrible Marky-Mark end, I need only flip back to disc one-of-fourteen to begin my journey anew. And you always shall be at my side. Or on my mantel. Or on my cocktail table. Or next to my home entertainment system."

So say you. So say we all. 

Twentieth Century Fox Home Entertainment, 2006. 14 DVD discs; one ape head. $179.98 [originally; purchase used copies here]. Limited to 10,000 units.
---
* In the original version of this essay, these words linked to a video that re-imagined PLANET OF THE APES as an episode of THE TWILIGHT ZONE. Fox has apparently issued takedown orders on every copy on the Internet now, except for one version the last 1/3 of the "episode," still available at this link.
---
Please click here to find your local chapter of Alcoholics Anonymous, for you or for someone you care about.

Labels: , , , , , , ,


Monday, January 07, 2013

CFP: A Comic of Her Own: Women Writing, Reading, and Embodying in Comics (UF) (Jan 15; Mar 15-17)

A Comic of Her Own:
Women Writing, Reading, and Embodying in Comics
10th Annual UF Comics Conference
in association with ImageTexT
March 15-17, 2013
Keynote Speaker: Trina Robbins
Guest Artist: Leela Corman
Guest Artist: Megan Kelso

Trina Robbins’ A Century of Women Cartoonists responds to a comics history which often forgets women.  In the past few years, interest has grown around women working in the comics industry, perhaps best exemplified by Hillary Chute’s 2010 Graphic Women. Similarly, academia has made many inroads into comics and gender through scholarship on superheroines in mainstream comics. Mike Madrid’s 2009 The Supergirls: Fashion, Feminism, Fantasy, and the History of Comic Book Heroines and Jennifer Stuller’s 2010 Ink-Stained Amazons and Cinematic Warriors: Superwomen in Modern Mythology, not to mention works by Trina Robbins and Lillian Robinson, attest to this growing interest in the representation of women in comics. However, these two scholarly fields rarely engage in meaningful dialog, despite their mutual interest: the examination of women in comics, whether behind the scenes or on the page. This conference hopes to facilitate this dialog and foster the scholarly exploration of intersections between women’s writing in comics, women represented in comics, and the women who read them. To accommodate this goal, the conference will feature a mixture of formats: keynote lectures, workshops with guest artists, Q & A sessions, panel discussions, and traditional academic conference presentations.

We encourage scholarly submissions on any one of these topics, as well as proposals for papers that explore the apparent gaps between them. Possible topics include, but are not limited to:
  • Superheroines in comics—how super are they, really?
  • Good Girls vs. Bad Girls in mainstream comics
  • Women’s writing as autobiography
  • What women want—explorations of titles that are popular with female readers
  • Queer women in comics
  • Girly men and manly women in comics—how is gender drawn?
  • Feminist readings of mainstream comics—are women still in the refrigerator?
  • Monstrous women in comics—sexed/gendered readings of monstrous, radioactive, and generally othered bodies in mainstream comics
  • Female sexuality in comics—from mainstream sex goddesses to queer alternatives
  • Studies of work by particular women writers and/or artists
  • Challenges to the “graphic women” canon
  • Girls in children's picture books and children's picture books “for girls”
  • Adaptation of comics superheroines to the big screen—representational differences and challenges in media adaptation
  • Women in animation—the female form in motion
Please send 250-word abstracts to imagetext@english.ufl.edu by January 15th, 2013.

Labels: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,


Wednesday, October 03, 2012

CFP: Caricature: A Lost Origin of Animation / conference panel (Nov. 1; Apr. 19-21)

CALL FOR PAPERS:
CARICATURE:
A LOST ORIGIN OF ANIMATION

This call is for a panel proposal for the Illustration, Comics, and Animation Conference to be held at Dartmouth College, April 19-21 2013.

While most animation historians look for the origins of animation in lanterna magicae, shadow theatre and vaudeville, among others, one major influence seems to be often overlooked : caricature, or "print cartoon."

  • By exploring the conditions of emergence of animation and especially the artistic backgrounds of its pioneers, this panel seeks to discover the roots of animation aesthetics in caricature and comic strips, also known at the turn of the century as "print cartoons."
  • How do contemporary animated films and shorts retain the aesthetic priorities of early print cartoons?
  • Are there particular animated films or shorts that demonstrate this origin in caricature more forcefully than others?
  • What new understandings are forged when we accept print cartoons as a direct ancestor and still very close relative of animation?
  • And how might this cross media approach encourage a more global and/or interdisciplinary study of caricature, the image, visuality, or the cartoon?
  • What qualities specific to animation resist this genealogical approach to the medium rooted in caricature and print cartoon?
  • What, in other words, refuses to cross-over?

Please send 300 word abstracts and a brief bio no later than November 1, 2012 to: Stéphane Collignon boul.sc@gmail.com

Inquiries about the conference should be addressed to Michael A. Chaney: michael.chaney@dartmouth.edu

Labels: , , , , ,


Monday, September 24, 2012

CFP: Science Fiction Media (Oct. 5; Apr. 10-14)

Note the explicit suggestion of "SF Comics and Manga"...

Call for Papers
April 10-14, 2013

Riverside, CA
Science Fiction Media

This conference—cosponsored by the Eaton Collection of Science Fiction and Fantasy (UC Riverside) and the Science Fiction Research Association—will examine science fiction in multiple media. The past several decades have witnessed an explosion in SF texts across the media landscape, from film and TV to comics and digital games. We are interested in papers that explore SF as a multimedia phenomenon, whether focusing on popular mass media, such as Hollywood blockbusters, or on niche and subcultural forms of expression, such as MUDs and vidding. We invite paper and panel proposals that focus on all forms of SF, including prose fiction, and that address (but are not limited to) the following topics:

  • Mainstream Hollywood vs. Global SF Cinema
  • SF Comics and Manga
  • SF Anime and Animation
  • SF on the Internet and the World Wide Web
  • Multimedia “dispersed” SF narratives
  • Fandom, Cosplay, Mashups, and Remixing
  • Broadcast and Cable SF Television
  • SF Videogames
  • World’s Fairs, Theme Parks, and other “Material” SF Media
  • Short-form SF film
  • Afrofuturism
  • SF and/in Music
  • SF Idiom and Imagery in Advertising
  • Webisodes and TV Games
  • SF Art and Illustration
Abstracts of 500 words (for papers of 20-minutes in length) should be submitted by October 5, 2012. We also welcome panel proposals gathering three papers on a cohesive topic. 

Send electronic submissions to conference co-chair Melissa Conway at <Melissa.Conway@ucr.edu<mailto:Conway@Melissa.Conway@ucr.edu>> with the subject heading: EATON/SFRA CONFERENCE PROPOSAL. Please include a brief bio with your abstract and indicate whether your presentation would require A/V.

To insure that your proposal will receive consideration, please follow these instructions carefully:
  1. Send your proposal in a separate WORD file. Proposals pasted into e-mail windows will be returned to the sender for resubmission. The file should be saved  as follows: Last name, first initial. 2013  (e.g, Doe, J. 2013).
  2. Include your name and e-mail in the top left-hand corner of your WORD file.  The organizers need this information to correspond with you.
  3. Send your 100-word biographical statemen as a separate WORD file.  Save the file as" Doe, J. BIO."
  4. Use the subject line: Eaton/SFRA Conference Proposal. This helps the organizers to sort and search for proposals. Files without this subject line may be overlooked inadvertently.
For more information on the conference, including travel and accommodations, see http://eatonconference.ucr.edu/ 

Labels: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,


Friday, May 07, 2010

CFP Update - Graphic Engagement: The Politics of Comics and Animation (June 18; September 2-4)

Now updated with information about keynote speaker Kim Deitch. (A great choice!)

 The Purdue Comparative Literature Program
presents the 2010 Conference

Graphic Engagement:
The Politics of Comics and Animation

Purdue University – West Lafayette, IN
September 2-4, 2010

The Purdue University Comparative Literature Program welcomes papers that explore the ways in which comics and film animation engage us politically and profoundly influence the way we define gender, race, religion, class, and nationhood. “Political” can be defined broadly, relating not only to affairs of state, but also the praxis of visual narrative and ways it affects individual identity and community dynamics.  Possible paper topics may include, but are not limited to:

  • The appropriation of national myths and folktales in animated film
  • Dynamics of humor and subversion in syndicated comic strips 
  • Imaging the ethnic/racial other in comics and other forms of visual narrative 
  • Representations of gender and sexuality in anime and manga 
  • The Franco-Belgian comics tradition and its political import 
  • The language of comics as a form of rhetoric 
  • Superheroes as defining, or complicating, communal and national identity 
  • The use of graphic novels and animation in the classroom 
  • Socio-political issues surrounding graphic novels and library cataloging 
  • The links between comic/animated images and the gaming industry 
  • Visual representations of conflict in such places as Israel, Korea, and Germany 
  • Political cartooning and its social impact 
  • Representations of trauma in comics and animation 
  • Journalism, biography, and memoir in comics
Keynote Speaker
Kim Deitch
Kim Deitch got his start in the late 1960s, working at The East Village Other and Gothic Blimp Works. An Eisner Award-winning writer with experience in both comics and animation, he is the author of such works as All Waldo Comics, The Boulevard of Broken Dreams, Alias the Cat, Shadowland, and The Search for Smilin’ Ed.

For up-to-date information on the event, including details on the keynote speaker and registration, visit the conference website: http://graphicengagement.wordpress.com/


Email abstracts of 250 words, with a brief author biography, to:
graphic.engagement@gmail.com
Please include “Graphic Engagement Conference 2010” in the subject heading.


Deadline for submissions is June 18, 2010.
 

Hotel rooms have been set aside at the Union Club Hotel, Purdue Memorial Union
101 N Grant Street | West Lafayette, IN 47907 | (800) 320-6291
http://www.union.purdue.edu/HTML/UnionClubHotel/


http://www.weeniebaste.com/CFP-Purdue2010.pdf

Labels: , , , , ,


Saturday, March 13, 2010

Graphic Engagement: The Politics of Comics and Animation (June 18; Sept. 2-4)

The Purdue Comparative Literature Program
presents the 2010 Conference
Graphic Engagement:
The Politics of Comics and Animation
Purdue University – West Lafayette, IN
September 2-4, 2010

Comics and film animation are potent media that can have an effect far different from that of more tradition forms of literature. They are composite texts whose mixtures of image, word, and sound offer a more immediate exchange between author(s) and audience, where the visuals directly confront us and demand a reader response in ways that prose narrative does not. The resulting effects can have profound ideological consequences. Either in the form of a comics memoir, a Disney adaptation, a superhero saga, or a single-panel cartoon, graphic narratives shape the way we frame ourselves in terms of gender, race, religion, class, and nationhood.

The Purdue University Comparative Literature Program will be sponsoring a conference devoted to this topic, welcoming papers that explore the ways in which comics and animation engage us politically. Our understanding of "political" is broad in scope, relating not only to affairs of state, but the praxis of graphic narrative and ways it impacts individual identity and community dynamics. Possible paper topics may include, but are not limited to:
  • Historical representations in graphic novels
  • The appropriation of national myths and folktales in animated film
  • Dynamics of humor and subversion in syndicated comic strips
  • Imaging the ethnic/racial other in comics and other forms of graphic narrative
  • Representations of gender and sexuality in anime and manga
  • Personal memoir in graphic novels or animation
  • The language of comics as a form of rhetoric
  • Representations of trauma in graphic narrative
  • Animation and its links to education
  • Socio-political issues surrounding graphic novels and library cataloging
  • Superheroes and the definition, or complication, of communal and national identity
  • Graphic narrative as transnational discourse
  • Political cartooning and its social impact
  • Hollywood and comics
  • Journalism, biography, and graphic narrative
  • Using comics and graphic novels as children's and adolescent literature
Email abstracts of 250 words, with a brief author biography, to:
graphic.engagement@gmail.com
Please include "Graphic Engagement Conference 2010" in the subject heading

Deadline for submissions is June 18, 2010

Hotel rooms have been set aside at the Union Club Hotel, Purdue Memorial Union
101 N Grant Street | West Lafayette, IN 47907 | (800) 320-6291
http://www.union.purdue.edu/HTML/UnionClubHotel/

Labels: , , , , ,


Wednesday, November 25, 2009

Animation 4.3 (2009) - Comics and Animation Special Issue

The brand-new issue of Animation: An Interdisciplinary Journal is a special issue: "Comics and Animation." Click this link for the table of contents, with links to abstracts. Looks like there could be some fascinating stuff here.

Labels: , ,


Monday, February 04, 2008

Fellowship Opportunity: Fisher Center Predoctoral Fellow (due March 1, 2008)

Note the broader interest in comics and graphic novels in addition to animation...

Feeling Animated? Not Sure If Your Project Fits?
Email Betty Bayer and Ask Her about this Pre-Doctoral Fellowship at BAYER@HWS.EDU


The Fisher Center for the Study of Women and Men at Hobart and William Smith Colleges is seeking a Predoctoral Fellow for the academic year 2008-2009 whose area of expertise falls within our theme of Animation (Making Life Graphic) and Gender.

By animation, we are interested in a broad spectrum of work, from film, comics and graphic novels through to ways performance and studio arts, science and technology and other disciplines (and interdisciplines) make life move and change. We seek dissertation scholars whose work critically engages the terms of our theme and are especially interested in candidates who would contribute to the diversity of the campus. The fellowship offers an opportunity to gain experience teaching in private liberal arts institutions while completing dissertation work, and carries a stipend of $30,000.00. Fellows will teach one course per semester, attend Fisher Center lectures and meetings, and present one colloquium.

Doctoral candidates nearing completion of dissertation must submit a one-page description of scholarship, a short statement on teaching interests, curriculum vitae, arrange to have three letters of reference, and a writing sample (e.g., chapter of dissertation). Completed applications are due by March 1, 2008 to:
Betty M. Bayer, Director
The Fisher Center for the Study of Women and Men at Hobart and William Smith Colleges
Geneva NY 14456
Information on the Center and the series can be found on our web site.

Labels: , , ,


Sunday, March 05, 2006

Congratulations, John Canemaker!

John Canemaker (author of the magisterial Winsor McCay: His Life and Art), along with co-producer Peggy Stern, just accepted an Academy Award for his animated short film, "The Moon and the Sun: An Imagined Conversation". Congratulations!

Be sure to check out JohnCanmaker.com, where you can learn much more about this most important voice in animation scholarship, including the publication information on his staggering output of books and articles.

Labels: , ,